Biohazard Levels In Laboratory Practice And Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: Implications For Healthcare Security And Medical Laboratory Operations

Authors

  • Mohammed Murtada Ahmed Alhazmi, Hussein Mohammed Seddiq, Tareq Mohammed Ali Refaei, Manal Mohsen Khormi, Ibrahim Mohammed Faqih, Othman Ahmed Alfawd, Fayez Abdullah Al Hattab
  • Mohammed Ahmed Shami, Mousa Mohammed Siddiq Hakami, Mohammed Ayad Nasir Alqahtani, Mohammed Mousa Ahmed Mansour, Nariman Ahmed Eissa Yaseen, Najla Adel Alharbi, Adel Ahmed Harisy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70082/ax0a7836

Abstract

Background: Biosafety levels (BSLs) provide a graded, CDC‑derived framework that translates organism- and procedure‑specific risk into laboratory practices, engineering controls, and facility design. Yet, healthcare security increasingly depends on how these controls extend beyond the bench to the pharmaceutical supply chain, where lapses can propagate through specimen logistics, manufacturing interfaces, and therapeutic distribution.

Aim: To operationalize BSL requirements across end‑to‑end laboratory workflows and pharmaceutical supply chains, and to quantify implications for healthcare security and medical laboratory operations.

Methods: We synthesized contemporary biosafety doctrine with operational analyses of high‑risk nodes across sample collection, transport, storage, processing, and distribution. Methods included risk mapping by BSL tier, evaluation of surrogate‑based decontamination validation, clarification of certification versus validation requirements, appraisal of risk‑based stratification for aerosol‑generating tuberculosis (TB) procedures, and review of BSL‑4 training and partnership models. We used these insights to design a scalable, auditable implementation framework and decision‑support tools (KPIs, operating standards, and communication protocols).

Results: The framework demonstrates measurable gains in safety and continuity by: (i) institutionalizing BSL‑1 surrogate testing to standardize disinfectant performance at logistics nodes; (ii) distinguishing certification from validation to strengthen BSL‑2 assurance across multi‑site networks; (iii) adopting procedure‑specific, risk‑based controls for TB work to preserve capacity while elevating protection at aerosol‑intensive steps; and (iv) advancing BSL‑4 readiness via cross‑sector training and supply‑chain governance. Collectively, these measures reduce laboratory‑acquired infections, contamination events, and care delays while improving interoperability.

Conclusion: Aligning BSL controls with real‑world laboratory operations and supply‑chain constraints transforms biosafety from a compliance obligation into a strategic enabler of healthcare security, safeguarding patients, personnel, and communities.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Biohazard Levels In Laboratory Practice And Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: Implications For Healthcare Security And Medical Laboratory Operations. (2024). The Review of Diabetic Studies , 820-830. https://doi.org/10.70082/ax0a7836